“Urban agriculture is an oxymoron. People that believe in
that are just fooling themselves.” This was the response of a man who was
presenting to my Peace Corps program group during a training session recently.
He had asked for us each to say our name, where we were from, and if we had any
experience with agriculture. Given my experience with Revision International’s
program Re:farm Denver, I said that I have some experience in urban
agriculture. The man, we’ll call him Bob, was a Ph.D. biologist who specialized
in high-output greenhouse vegetable production. He had been brought to Moldova
by an amazing program that brings experts in different agricultural fields from
the States to consult and help Moldovan farmers for usually around 15 days.
Although his session was extremely informative and it was
obvious he had an abundance of knowledge about how to get the most production
out of any given greenhouse setting, I couldn’t help but ponder his somewhat
upsetting comment about urban agriculture. Indeed his sentiments are nothing
new. I’ve seen the same thoughts tracking across the faces of most farmers whom
I’ve told about the work we do with Re:farm Denver in the city; they simply
think we’re not doing real work. Their looks say that if we’re serious about feeding
the world, we’d go lease 1000 acres, get a John Deere tractor, sprayer, and
combine to plant, inundate, and harvest a single commodity crop which would
then more than likely make its way into the stomachs of animals who weren’t
meant to eat that kind of food anyway before the fat on their bones makes it to
our mouths. The only exception to this has been my father-in-law, a South
Dakotan farmer who has shown a genuine interest in my work with food in the
city.
Don’t misunderstand me, large-scale farms (perhaps not as
large as today’s farms though), technical equipment like tractors, ploughs,
combines, etc, do indeed need to play an important role in the future or our
food. Yet, with the global population creeping (read: racing) away from the
rural lifestyle and toward the urban and suburban cityscapes, we must engage those
settings with the question of how to feed themselves. Oil is dwindling
worldwide; fossil-fuel based fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, insecticides,
are growing ever-more expensive; and the transportation to fly, ship, and drive
food from the farm to the table is today longer and therefore requires more
inputs than ever before in history. All this put together means that using the
spaces which are available to us in the urban setting to grow what we can is more
than simply not an oxymoron, it is a vital component of creating a future for
our children when oil runs out.
It is also important to remember that we (most people in ‘developed’
nations) are forgetting both what real food is, and how to grow it. With
grocery stores packed with tens of thousands of combinations of the compounds
thought up by food scientists, and an increasingly urban population, we’ve
firmly lost touch with where our food comes from. Unlike here in Moldova, where
every family has a garden as well as a small plot of land on which they grow
corn, grapes, sunflowers (for the seeds and the oil), having a garden in the
States is largely considered a luxury or a hobby. Less than 2% of our
population are farmers, and that number is still shrinking as my generation
grows up and wants to leave the small towns for the big cities. Programs like
Re:farm Denver are reteaching people about food. Reshowing people what it means
to eat healthy. Reminding people that growing food is always cheaper than buying
it.
All the families Revision works with for establishing
household gardens are living at or below the Federal poverty line. They also
live in food deserts, areas of the city where there is no grocery store. Where
the only option for food is the junk food at the cornerstore. These families
can’t afford to eat healthy thanks to our current national food system and
policies (a topic for another blog), so they have higher rates of Type II
diabetes, heart disease, and obesity. I have seen the difference a backyard
garden can make in these families’ lives. When a family of four living on a
household income of less than fifteen thousand dollars a year saves $40 per
week by having a household garden, that is real. When kids are involved in
growing their own food and now are excited to eat the vegetables they have
helped grow, that is real.
So, urban agriculture can’t be an oxymoron. Cities can, do,
and need to continue growing as much food as they possibly can within their own
city limits. A very viable path for low-income families toward a healthier
lifestyle is through relearning how to garden, which not only connects them
with the Earth which sustains us, but also, inevitably, with their neighbors as
they search for venues to share their surplus harvests.
Join the movement. Grow some of your own food next year and
volunteer or donate to an organization like Revision which helps low-income
neighborhoods do the same.
So true. How can urban agriculture be an oxymoron in a city like Denver, whose Urban Gardens' network alone produces over 294 tons of fresh healthy food a year?
ReplyDeleteAlso, Bill knows an urban farmer here in Moldova; remind us to put you in touch.