It’s a shame the terms ‘pro-life’ and ‘pro-choice’ have been
co-opted into the narrow-sighted and polarizing argument about the morality of
abortion (and, by the way, they are not, by definition, opposites; if you
really oppose pro-life, doesn’t that mean you’re pro-death? And if you oppose
pro-choice, are you pro-indecision?). In reality, there is so much in this
world in need of our attention, that perhaps its time we expand the scope of
these terms. Indeed the leaders of two of the largest branches of the Christian
church, have already expanded the idea of what it means to be ‘pro-life’. In
2002, Pope John Paul II and Ecumenical Patriarch His Holiness Bartholomew I
(leader of the Eastern Orthodox church), after concluding a symposium on
religion, science, and the environment, together signed a statement detailing a code of environmental ethics.
The unfortunate unwillingness of the majority of Christians worldwide
to engage our responsibility to the environment as a mandate from God the
Creator is amazing. Not only does this ignore the teachings of Jesus, but it
also ignores the entire of purpose of our lives, as Bartholomew of
Constantinople and the late John Paul II so eloquently articulate.
“A new approach and a new culture are
needed, based on the centrality of the human person within creation and inspired
by environmentally ethical behavior stemming from our triple relationship to
God, to self, and to creation. Such an ethics fosters interdependence and
stresses the principles of universal solidarity, social justice, and
responsibility, in order to promote a
true culture of life.” (emphasis mine)
They are calling all of humanity, every person of every
faith to join together and become pro-life and pro-choice. We must realize that
this ‘culture of life’ cherishes the inherent value of all life. To be pro-life
should mean that we all “…think of the world’s children [indeed all future
generations] when we reflect on and evaluate our options for action.” To be
pro-choice should mean to choose to allow this “… love for our children [to]
show us the path that we must follow into the future.” So in reality, if we
step back and reflect rationally, we should all be pro-life and pro-choice. Yet reason and logic
only take us so far in this quest to rethink how we live together with each
other and with the Earth that sustains us.
“The problem is not simply economic and
technological; it is moral and spiritual. A solution at the economic and
technological level can be found only if we undergo, in the most radical way,
an inner change of heart, which can lead to a change in lifestyle and of
unsustainable patterns of consumption and production.”
Let us deepen our definitions of pro-life and pro-choice. Or
perhaps, let us take our eyes off the symptom that abortion is and commit
ourselves to addressing the actual illness. We have, as humanity, stepped away
from the original purpose we were given; to be stewards of creation, working it
and keeping it for our children.
Joseph, I have not seen many writers who are up to your standards and true understanding of what you are trying to express... and with the ability to express it!
ReplyDelete